Chrys ingraham biography of donald

To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. To browse Academia. This article critiques the reliance of feminist sociology on the heterosexual imaginary, which normalizes heterosexuality while treating gender as socially constructed. It argues for a re-evaluation of gender as the central organizing concept in feminist sociology, positing that institutionalized heterosexuality is more significant than gender itself in capitalist patriarchal societies.

By adopting a materialist feminist perspective, the essay calls for a systemic analysis to challenge and disrupt normative understandings of gender, urging feminist scholars to address the historical and material conditions that underpin these constructs. Since the end of the twentieth century, gender perspectives have become dominant in social sciences and focus on a range of topics that investigate the social positions and life chances of men and women in various societies.

Quite recently queer theories and intersectionality have become prominent paradigms within gender studies. Both approaches indicate the power of the binary classification of people into men and women and focus on the ways gender and sexuality shape identities and subjectivities, and their variation over time in a given culture.

Reporter, Minnesota Reformer. Ex-WaPo,

Gender is also a significant category for policy with gender equality becoming a core value, and even an indicator, for the " development " of societies. The confusions that have originated from the gender category are explored and described. A confusion that arises from the feminist academy in the distinction as to how the biological bodies of human beings become social, and therefore, every social interaction is sexed.

The gender category has been widely divulged in the last years, but while doing it, its use has become freer and less rigorous, identifying it with feminine, women, feminist movements and social movements of women. Underlying theoretical and epistemology are proposed. Theoretical essays that borrow categories of social analysis from conceptual schemes are revised, but these are decontextualized when using them for theorizations of gender.

Difficulties arise in the theoretical categories of sociological character and of political science such as social construction and power, they are transported without epistemic mediation or specification to the language of other disciplines, mainly psychology or anthropology.